The problem with a brain dump is that it often becomes another pile to avoid. You finally get the tabs, errands, text messages, meeting fragments, and half-decisions out of your head, then the page sits there like a laundry basket full of cables.

For ADHD brains, the useful version is not "write everything, then become a perfect project manager." The useful version is: capture the mess before it evaporates, preserve enough context that it still makes sense later, and let Capy do the first pass of grouping, extracting, and turning loose thoughts into something you can revisit.

This guide gives you a simple protocol for doing that inside Docapybara: one vault, quick capture, audio recording with speaker diarization when typing is too much, inline databases when you need a small amount of structure, and Capy searching your own material instead of asking you to remember where the thought went.

## Start before you organize

A brain dump is most useful when it happens before the organizing impulse arrives. If you pause to decide whether a thought is a task, a note, a worry, a reference, or a future idea, you're already doing the expensive part. The point is to lower the cost of getting it out.

Create one page in your vault called something plain, like "Brain dump inbox." Don't decorate it. Don't make a dashboard first. Put today's date at the top and start typing fragments exactly as they arrive: "ask Maya about contract language," "why did the onboarding email feel confusing," "dentist," "look up bridge convention notes," "the invoice PDF has the wrong address."

If you already know that traditional folders make capture harder, [Note-Taking with ADHD](/guides/adhd-neurodivergent/best-note-taking-adhd/) walks through the broader setup. This protocol is the smaller daily move inside that system.

## Use voice when typing adds friction

Some thoughts don't survive the walk to the keyboard. They show up while you're making coffee, leaving a meeting, or standing in the hallway with three things half-started. In those moments, audio is not a luxury feature. It's the least lossy capture method.

In Docapybara, record in-app and let the transcript land in the vault. For solo brain dumps, speaker diarization is quiet but still useful; for conversations, it matters a lot. If your "brain dump" is really a debrief with a coworker or a call with a client, speaker labels keep the transcript readable without asking you to replay the whole thing.

After recording, add one short note above the transcript: "This is about the April launch page" or "I was worried about the refund policy." That tiny human label gives Capy a better starting point later.

## Separate raw capture from review

The most common brain-dump trap is trying to process the list while you're still dumping. You write "renew passport," then immediately open a browser, then remember an email, then lose the original thread. The page becomes a doorway to twelve other tasks.

Use two modes instead. Capture mode is allowed to be ugly. Review mode happens later, in a short block, when the goal is to make the page useful. You can even write the boundary into the page:

```text
Raw capture above this line.
Review notes below this line.
```

When review starts, ask Capy for a first pass: "Read today's brain dump and group it into tasks, ideas, worries, references, and things that need a decision. Keep the original wording when it matters." This is a grounded request. Capy is not inventing a productivity philosophy; it's sorting the material you gave it.

## Let Capy extract next actions

Brain dumps mix several kinds of information. "Call Sam" is a task. "The proposal feels too vague" is a concern. "Maybe the headline should mention PDFs" is an idea. "Mom's appointment is Thursday" is a calendar-adjacent reminder. Treating all of that as one checklist makes the page feel louder than it needs to be.

Ask Capy to extract only the next actions first. A useful prompt is: "From this page, list the actions I can actually take. If something is only a worry or an idea, put it in a separate section." Then review the result and delete anything that doesn't belong.

This pairs well with [How to Capture Ideas Without Losing Your Train of Thought](/guides/adhd-neurodivergent/capture-ideas-without-losing-thought/), especially if your brain dumps contain a lot of creative fragments that shouldn't become tasks yet.

## Add one small inline database

Once the same kinds of items keep appearing, add a small inline database via the `:::database:::` directive. Keep it boring. A brain-dump database might have columns for item, type, next step, status, and review date. That's enough.

The database should not replace the raw page. It should sit underneath it like a tray. The page keeps the texture: why the thought arrived, what else was happening, what words you used when the idea was fresh. The database gives you a scan when you need to see what's open.

You can ask Capy to update it: "Add the unresolved tasks from today's dump to the database. Use waiting, doing, or later as the status." Because the database lives inline with the note, you don't have to leave the page and rebuild context in a separate tool.

## Bring PDFs and meeting notes into the same vault

Brain dumps are rarely only thoughts. They're often reactions to source material: a school form, a lease, a product brief, a client PDF, a transcript from yesterday's call. If those live elsewhere, the dump becomes a set of vague pointers.

Drop the source into Docapybara when it matters. PDFs are converted to markdown through docstrange, so Capy can treat them as searchable text instead of a file icon. Audio transcripts live beside the notes. Your typed fragments stay in the same vault. Later you can ask, "Which of today's worries came from the PDF?" or "Find the transcript moment where Jenna explained the deadline."

For the broader product idea behind that, [Claude Code for documents](/blog/claude-code-for-documents/) explains why an agent that acts on your documents feels different from a separate chat window.

## Review by asking better questions

The review doesn't need to be long. It needs to be repeatable. Once a day, or before the next planning block, open the brain dump page and ask Capy a few narrow questions.

Try: "What is still unresolved?" "What can be done in one small step?" "Which items need more information?" "What looks like the same issue repeated in different words?" These prompts make the page less foggy without requiring you to manually tag every line.

If the problem is more about the system surviving week after week, [A Productivity System That Survives ADHD](/guides/adhd-neurodivergent/productivity-system-survives-adhd/) is the next useful read. The brain dump is one input; the survival mechanism is what gets the important pieces back in front of you.

## Keep the protocol small

The protocol is intentionally modest: one capture page, optional audio, one review boundary, one small database, and a few Capy prompts. If it starts requiring a ceremony, trim it.

You can always add more later. Maybe a "waiting on" database becomes useful. Maybe you nest monthly brain-dump pages under one parent. Maybe you keep a separate page for medical questions, class notes, or client follow-ups. The vault can hold those shapes without asking you to decide everything on day one.

The point is not to become organized in the abstract. The point is to keep thoughts from disappearing, then make them usable when you have the attention to look again. [Try Docapybara free](/accounts/signup/) and start with one messy brain dump; Capy can help with the first pass after the thoughts are safely out.